Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 12;63(4):187–194. doi: 10.1159/000318881

Table 1.

Mean Fi values (bark) and results of Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc analyses

Speaker i I a ε u graphic file with name fpl0063-0187-f03.jpg Kruskal-Wallis Post hoc
Cl 3.58 4.52 6.85 5.4 3.87 4.82 0.000 a > ε > Inline graphic > I > Inline graphic > i
C2 3.56 4.59 7.27 6.17 3.71 4.87 0.000 a > ε > Inline graphic > I >Inline graphic, i
C3 3.69 4.38 6.39 5.65 3.82 4.52 0.000 a > ε > Inline graphic, I > u, i
CP1 3.44 4.65 7.23 5.5 3.8 4.72 0.000 a > ε > Inline graphic, I > u > i
CP2 3.44 4.36 6.29 5.37 3.81 4.45 0.000 a > ε > Inline graphic, I > u > i
CP3 3.61 4.11 5.87 4.97 3.85 4.43 0.000 a > ε > u > I, u > u, i
CP4 3.49 4.51 6.49 5.73 3.81 5.07 0.000 a > ε, Inline graphic > Inline graphic, I > u > i
CP5 4.06 4.8 6.85 5.42 4.52 5.08 0.000 a > ε, Inline graphic > Inline graphic, I > I, u > i
CP6 3.08 3.46 5.63 4.09 3.55 3.84 0.000 a > ε, Inline graphic > Inline graphic, u, i > I, i
CP7 3.53 3.79 5.51 4.63 3.3 3.8 0.000 a > ε > Inline graphic, I, i > i, u
CP8 3.87 4.22 4.98 4.66 3.98 4.34 0.000 a, ε, u > Inline graphic, I, u, i
CP9 3.79 4.02 4.78 4.5 3.79 3.96 0.000 a, ε, u > Inline graphic, I, u, i

C = Control. CP = Speakers with CP.