Table 1.
Effect of ihog mutation on adult viability
| Expected | Observed | |
|---|---|---|
| Cross: ihogDC1/+ females (f) × ihogDf/+ males (m) | ||
| F1 (n = 208) | ||
| ihog+/+ | 25% | 20%a |
| ihogDC1/+ | 25% | 21%a |
| ihogDf/+ | 25% | 35%a |
| ihogDC1/Df | 25% | 24%a |
| Cross: ihogDC1/DC1 (f) × ihogDf/+ (m) | ||
| F1 (n = 125) | ||
| ihogDC1/+ | 50% | 90%b |
| ihogDC1/Df | 50% | 10%b |
| Cross: ihogDC1/DC1 (f) × ihogDC1/+; UAS ihog::myc/+ (m) | ||
| F1 (n = 73) | ||
| ihogDC1/DC1; UAS ihog::myc/+ | 25% | 29%b |
| ihogDC1/DC1 | 25% | 5%b |
| ihogDC1/+; UAS ihog::myc | 25% | 33%b |
| ihogDC1/+ | 25% | 33%b |
aThe observed segregation ratio is not statistically different from expected (chi-square test: P > 0.05). bThe observed segregation ratio is statistically different from expected (chi-square test: P < 0.05).