Table 4.
Statistically significant differences in proportions (no. presented in per cent) of nurses with high critical thinking scores on the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI) total (i.e. ≥280) and subscales scores (i.e. ≥40) related to background data (Pearson’s chi-square test)
% | χ2 | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | |||
>30 years (n= 249) vs. ≤30 years (n= 361)* | |||
CCTDI total score | 88 vs. 75 | 14·44 | <0·001 |
Truth-seeking | 55 vs. 42 | 9·44 | 0·002 |
Systematicity | 88 vs. 80 | 6·19 | 0·013 |
Inquisitiveness | 96 vs. 91 | 5·39 | 0·020 |
Gender | |||
Males (n= 58) vs. females (n= 556) | |||
Analyticity | 88 vs. 73 | 6·01 | 0·014 |
University education prior to nursing education | |||
Yes (n= 114) vs. no (n= 492)† | |||
CCTDI total score | 87 vs. 79 | 4·07 | 0·044 |
Truth-seeking | 65 vs. 43 | 17·36 | <0·001 |
Work area | |||
Community health care (n= 222) vs. hospitals (n= 340)‡ | |||
CCTDI total score | 86 vs. 77 | 6·92 | 0·009 |
Systematicity | 88 vs. 81 | 5·43 | 0·020 |
Four respondents did not answer the question (n= 610).
Eight respondents did not answer the question (n= 606).
Forty-nine respondents (8%) had part-time positions in both hospitals and community health care (not reported here). Three respondents did not answer the question (n= 562).