Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct;66(10):2170–2181. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05282.x

Table 4.

Statistically significant differences in proportions (no. presented in per cent) of nurses with high critical thinking scores on the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI) total (i.e. ≥280) and subscales scores (i.e. ≥40) related to background data (Pearson’s chi-square test)

% χ2 P value
Age
>30 years (n= 249) vs. ≤30 years (n= 361)*
CCTDI total score 88 vs. 75 14·44 <0·001
Truth-seeking 55 vs. 42 9·44 0·002
Systematicity 88 vs. 80 6·19 0·013
Inquisitiveness 96 vs. 91 5·39 0·020
Gender
Males (n= 58) vs. females (n= 556)
Analyticity 88 vs. 73 6·01 0·014
University education prior to nursing education
Yes (n= 114) vs. no (n= 492)
CCTDI total score 87 vs. 79 4·07 0·044
Truth-seeking 65 vs. 43 17·36 <0·001
Work area
Community health care (n= 222) vs. hospitals (n= 340)
CCTDI total score 86 vs. 77 6·92 0·009
Systematicity 88 vs. 81 5·43 0·020
*

Four respondents did not answer the question (n= 610).

Eight respondents did not answer the question (n= 606).

Forty-nine respondents (8%) had part-time positions in both hospitals and community health care (not reported here). Three respondents did not answer the question (n= 562).