Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 18;17(8):999–1009. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.1

Table 3. Mean scores and proportion of participants in the survey who had a score above or below 3 (the neutral point) for determinants of the intention to participate or not to participate in the screening.

  All (n=418) Offer acceptors (test- intenders) (n=171) Offer decliners (test non-intenders) (n=247)
Variables/scalesa Mean Mean n(% ≥3) Mean n(% ≥3)
Theory of Planned Behaviour
 Attitude 3.8 4.1 168 (98) 3.5*** 206 (83)***
 Social influence 2.5 3.1 83 (49) 2.2*** 42 (17)***
 Perceived behavioural control 4.2 4.5 165 (96) 4.0*** 227 (92)***
           
Other variables
 Perceived benefits 3.9 4.3 158 (92) 3.6*** 198 (80)***
 Perceived consequences of test results 3.2 3.4 132 (77) 3.1*** 158 (64)**
 Severity of disorders 4.4 4.3 158 (92) 4.4 239 (97)*
 Perceived susceptibility 1.8 2.0 32 (19) 1.7*** 42 (17)
 Knowledge about inheritanceb 2.6 2.5 87 (51) 2.6 125 (51)
           
      n (% ≤3)   n (% ≤3)
 Impact of the offer 2.2 1.9 154 (90) 2.4*** 181 (73)***
 Stigmatisation 2.1 2.1 147 (86) 2.2 212 (86)
 Feeling of eugenics 2.5 2.2 139 (81) 2.6* 194 (79)
           
  n (% yes)   n (% yes)   n (% yes)
 Familiarity with disorders 241 (58)   94 (55)   147 (60)
 Familiarity with carrier test(s) 64 (15)   21 (12)   43 (17)
 Religion 16 (4)   7 (4)   9 (4)
a

Mean scores were based on a 5-point Likert scale. Except for ‘impact of the offer', ‘stigmatisation', and ‘feelings of eugenics', (1) represents a negative/unfavourable score and (5) a positive/favourable score.

b

Knowledge about inheritance was calculated as a sum score, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 5.

*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. Offer acceptors were compared with offer decliners on mean scores and on proportion of people with a score of 3 or above or a score of 3 or below (for ‘impact of the offer', ‘stigmatisation', and ‘feelings of eugenics').