Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;17(12):1615–1624. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.62

Table 2. Clinical data are shown of the FSHD patients and controls from whom the primary myoblasts and biopsy material were isolated, such as gender, age and repeat size.

Sample Gender Age (years) Pathological grade Repeat size (kb)
Myoblast/myotube cultures:
 Control A F 27 158
 Control B M 35 87
 Control C F 56 ND
 Control D F 42 65
 FSHD A M 41 + 18
 FSHD B F 45 + 25
 FSHD C M 40 +++ 31
 FSHD D M 57 + 26
 DM1 A F 75
 DM1 B F 85
 DM1 C F 130
         
Muscle biopsy material
 Control 1 M 30 ND
 Control 2 F 62 ND
 Control 3 M 44 ND
 Control 4 M 34 ND
 Control 5 F 47 ND
 Control 6 F 34 ND
 Control 7 M 53 ND
 Control 8 M 37 ND
 Control 9 M 65 ND
 Control 10 F 59 ND
 FSHD 1 F 61 + 18
 FSHD 2 M 60 + 26
 FSHD 3 M 33 ++ 16
 FSHD 4 F 57 + 27
 FSHD 5 M 35 ++ 15
 FSHD 6 F 55 ++ 27
 FSHD 7 M 43 + 28
 FSHD 8 M 54 + 36
 FSHD 9 M 37 + 33
 FSHD 10 F 45 + 27

The pathological grade of each biopsy was determined histologically based on examination of fiber size variability, extent of central nucleation, presence of necrosis/ regeneration and the presence of interstitial fibrosis. For each of the four features a score of 0–3 was given, 0 being normal and 3 being severely affected, for a cumulative score of 0–12. To simplify the tabulated scores the numerical score was converted +, mildly affected (score 1–4), ++, moderately affected (score 5–8) and +++, severely affected (score 9–12). For one sample a histological sample was unavailable and pathological scoring was not done (ND).