Table 1.
Comparison of different methods for identification of C. acetobutylicum pSOL1 genes in three sample pairs (six slides) of M5-WT experiments
| Gene identification method | No. of pSOL1 genes identified
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated
|
Down-regulated
|
Nondifferentially expressed
|
|||||||
| I | II | III | I | II | III | I | II | III | |
| MF&T (Mf = 2.5, Th = 500) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 18 | 17 | 146 | 160 | 159 |
| ERPD (95%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 12 | 23 | 141 | 165 | 152 |
| ANOVA (95%) | 8 | 5 | 6 | 40 | 23 | 19 | 130 | 144 | 153 |
| CHM (Po = 100:10) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 35 | 14 | 26 | 141 | 161 | 148 |
| SNN-LERSD (95%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 38 | 27 | 134 | 140 | 151 |
Mf, minimal fold change; Th, threshold; Po, posterior odds; 95%, confidence level. Roman numerals indicate time points.