Skip to main content
. 2010 May 5;18(9):978–984. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.54

Table 3. SMN gene copy numbers observed in 25 core families.

Case no. Clinical type SMN1/SMN2 ratio
    Patient Father Mother Sib
1 I 0:2(M) 1:1 1:1 or1:2a  
2 I 0:2(F) 1:1 1:2  
3 I 0:2(M) 1:2 1:1  
4 I 0:2(F) 1:3 2:0a  
5 I 0:3(M) 2:1b 1:3  
6 I 0:2(M) 1:2 1:1 or1:2a  
7 I 0:2(F) 1:1 1:2  
8 I 0:3(M) 1:2 1:3  
9 I 1D:3(M) 1+1D:2 1:3 2:2(F)
10 I 0:2(M) 1:1 1:2  
11 I 0:2(M) 1:2 1:1  
12 I 0:2(M) 1:2 1:3  
13 I 0:2(F) 1:2 1:3  
14 II 0:3(M) 1:2 1:3  
15 II 0:3(M) 1:3 1:1  
16 II 0:3(F) 2:1b 1:3  
17 II 0:3(M) 1:1 1:2 or 1:3a  
18 II 0:3(F) 1:2 1:3  
19 III 0:4(F) 1:2 1:3 0:2(F)
20 III 0:3(M) 1:2 1:3  
21 III 0:3(F) 1:3 1:2 or 1:3a  
22 III 0:3(F) 1:1 1:3  
23 III 0:4(M) 1:3 1:2 or 1:3a  
24 III 0:4(F) 1:3 1:3  
25 III 1D:3(F) 1+1D:1 1:3  

M, male; F, female.

a

Blood samples were not available from these individuals, and therefore their SMN genotypes were assumed based on the genotypes determined for their patients and fathers from the family study.

b

These two fathers were found to be the ‘carriers with the ‘2+0' genotype by the further family testing.