Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;62(2):192–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04138.x

Table 1.

Prediction of putative casein kinase 2 (CK2) phosphorylation sites in AtSIG6

Position in consensus motif
Position Aminoacid NetPhos 2.0 NetPhosK 1.0 KinasePhos 2.0 disphos gps PREDPhospho ScanSite −2 −1 * +1 +2 +3 +4 Homology
26 Serine * * Y S S P S S V
94 Serine * * * * * * L V S S R E D
95 Serine * * * * * * V S S R E D E
149 Serine * A L S A S K Q
174 Serine * * * * S L S T S S S AtSIG2
176 Serine * * * S T S S S M S
180 Serine * * * * * S M S L P E K AtSIG5
206 Serine * P K S N D V D
244 Threonine * P E T K Q L L
249 Threonine * L L T A K E E AtSIG1-5
282 Threonine * E P T I G E W
306 Serine * * G R S S R E K
411 Serine * * * R P S K E E L AtSIG4, 5
423 Threonine * V S T E K L D
445 Serine * * I W S D Q D T
450 Threonine * * D T T F Q E I AtSIG4
458 Serine * * * * P D S G I E T AtSIG1, 3, 5
462 Threonine * I E T P T M S AtSIG2, 3, 4
484 Serine * * * V L S P K E R AtSIG4
504 Serine * * * Q R S L S E I AtSIG1-5
CK2 consensus substrate site S/T x x E/D x

Prediction tools NetPhos 2.0 (Blom et al., 1999), NetPhosK 1.0 (Blom et al., 2004), KinasePhos 2.0 (Wong et al., 2007), disphos (Diella et al., 2004), gps (Xue et al., 2005), PREDPhospho (Kim et al., 2004) and ScanSite (Obenauer et al., 2003) were used, leading to the detection of putative sites (+). Those selected for subsequent experiments are set in bold. The phosphoacceptor residue (*) and the acidic residue at the n + 3 position are marked in bold. Arabidopsis sigma factors showing regional similarity with AtSIG6 CK2 sites are indicated in the last column (Figure S2 for detailed positions). Bottom: consensus sequence of CK2 phosphorylation sites (Meggio and Pinna, 2003).