Table 5.
Final logistic regression model that predict adherence to dose, time and food in JUSH, Southwest Ethiopia, 2009.
| Variables | Adherence | Crude OR (95% CI) |
P-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adhered N (%) |
Non Adhered N (%) |
|||||
| WHO stage | 0.01 | 0.13 | ||||
| I | 4(33.3%) | 8(66.7%) | 0.26(0.07-0.96) | 0.17(0.042-1.18) | ||
| II | 56(71.8%) | 22(28.2%) | 1.31(0.62-2.74) | 1.19(0.54- 2.56) | ||
| III | 134(77.5%) | 39(22.5%) | 1.76(0.91-3.41) | 1.35(0.67- 2.72) | ||
| IV | 37(66.1%) | 19(33.9%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Average family income Tertile | 0.03 | 0.10 | ||||
| Lowest | 64(69.6%) | 28(30.4%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Middle | 88(71.0%) | 36(29.0%) | 1.04(0.20-0.93) | 1.07(0.58-1.98) | ||
| Highest | 70(77.8%) | 20(22.2%) | 1.53(0.23-0.98) | 1.60(0.80-3.20) | ||
| Getting family support | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||
| No | 147(78.6%) | 40(21.4%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 84(63.6%) | 48(36.4%) | 0.48(0.29-0.78) | 2.12(1.25-3.59) | ||
| Sex | 0.03 | 0.18 | ||||
| Male | 113(78.5%) | 31(21.5%) | 1.76(1.06-2.93) | 0.70(0.41-1.20) | ||
| Female | 118(67.4%) | 57(32.6%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||