Table 2.

QTL results from the joint design and back fat

SSC	Position	CIa	F-value	paddb	pdomc	pimpd	Order of effectse
1	90	[59.3; 95.8]	3.11	0.0195	0.0762	0.1062	âP > âM > âW
1	144	[126.3; 149.6]	6.81	<0.0001	0.0889	0.2779	âP > âM > âW
1	179	[149.6; 209.1]	2.80	0.0101	0.1010	0.5290	âM > âP = âW
2	13	[0.0; 39.9]	5.01	0.0058	0.5031	<0.0001	âM > âP = âW
2	77	[68.0; 81.0]	5.79	<0.0001	0.1947	0.3441	âP > âM > âW
6	100	[96.4; 101.2]	6.46	<0.0001	0.0275	0.0587	âM > âP = âW
7	83	[75.5; 100.9]	5.81	<0.0001	0.0593	0.0422	âW > âM = âP
11	83	[61.0; 93.3]	2.77	0.0094	0.1511	0.0939	âP > âM = âW
12	58	[0.0; 84.1]	3.37	0.2599	0.0006	0.2458	âM = âP = âW
13	56	[39.2; 81.2]	2.34	0.3950	0.0134	0.1595	âM = âP = âW
14	51	[27.5; 60.7]	3.05	0.0107	0.0332	0.0802	âM = âP > âW
17	74	[43.6; 97.9]	2.26	0.0199	0.9068	0.0267	âM > âP = âW
18	27	[10.9; 43.6]	4.38	<0.0001	0.0251	0.2384	âM = âP > âW

^a confidence interval; ^b comparison-wise error probability for additive effects; ^c comparison-wise error probability for dominant effects; ^d comparison-wise error probability for imprinting effects; ^e â_P estimated effect of Pietrain breed, â_M estimated effect of Meishan breed, â_W estimated effect of the wild boar breed