Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 1;42(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-40

Table 2.

QTL results from the joint design and back fat

SSC Position CIa F-value paddb pdomc pimpd Order of effectse
1 90 [59.3; 95.8] 3.11 0.0195 0.0762 0.1062 âP > âM > âW
1 144 [126.3; 149.6] 6.81 <0.0001 0.0889 0.2779 âP > âM > âW
1 179 [149.6; 209.1] 2.80 0.0101 0.1010 0.5290 âM > âP = âW
2 13 [0.0; 39.9] 5.01 0.0058 0.5031 <0.0001 âM > âP = âW
2 77 [68.0; 81.0] 5.79 <0.0001 0.1947 0.3441 âP > âM > âW
6 100 [96.4; 101.2] 6.46 <0.0001 0.0275 0.0587 âM > âP = âW
7 83 [75.5; 100.9] 5.81 <0.0001 0.0593 0.0422 âW > âM = âP
11 83 [61.0; 93.3] 2.77 0.0094 0.1511 0.0939 âP > âM = âW
12 58 [0.0; 84.1] 3.37 0.2599 0.0006 0.2458 âM = âP = âW
13 56 [39.2; 81.2] 2.34 0.3950 0.0134 0.1595 âM = âP = âW
14 51 [27.5; 60.7] 3.05 0.0107 0.0332 0.0802 âM = âP > âW
17 74 [43.6; 97.9] 2.26 0.0199 0.9068 0.0267 âM > âP = âW
18 27 [10.9; 43.6] 4.38 <0.0001 0.0251 0.2384 âM = âP > âW

a confidence interval; b comparison-wise error probability for additive effects; c comparison-wise error probability for dominant effects; d comparison-wise error probability for imprinting effects; e âP estimated effect of Pietrain breed, âM estimated effect of Meishan breed, âW estimated effect of the wild boar breed