Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug 10;81S1:S22–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.019

Table 6.

Relevance to content among men who have never had any CRC screening test or are not adherent to CRC screening guidelines, N=346

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Coefficient SE p Coefficient SE p Coefficient SE p
Fixed effects
    Mean relevance to content score 3.63 0.07 <.01 3.02 0.16 <.01 3.0 0.16 <.01
    Intervention
        Evidential Reference Reference Reference
        Socio-cultural 0.06 0.10 .54 0.10 0.14 .46 0.11 0.14 .43
    Time 0.001 0.001 .19 0.001 0.001 <.01 0.002 0.001 <.01
    Time × Intervention -0.0001 0.001 .88 -0.001 0.001 .21 -0.002 0.001 .13
    Assimilation 0.28 0.15 .06
    Intervention × Assimilation -0.23 0.22 .29
    Time × Assimilation -0.003 0.002 <.01
    Time × Intervention × Assimilation 0.003 0.002 <.05
    Humanist 0.32 0.15 <.05
    Intervention × Humanist -0.23 0.21 .28
    Time × Humanist -0.003 0.001 <.01
    Time × Intervention × Humanist 0.004 0.002 <.05
    Sociocultural: 0.16 0.04 <.05 0.16 0.04 <.01
    Religiosity
Random effects Variance SE p Variance SE p Variance SE p
    Level 1 effect (within person) 0.23 0.02 <.01 0.25 0.02 <.01 0.25 0.02 <.01
    Level 2 effects
        In initial status 0.47 0.07 <.01 0.46 0.07 <.01 0.46 0.07 <.01
Model fit
    -2LL/ Deviance 1638.7 1586.9 1578.1
    AIC 1646.7 1594.9 1586.1