Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 11;34(7):1033–1040. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0867-1

Table 1.

Patients’ clinical details

No. Sex/age Mechanism of injury type Side Fracture type Postoperative complications Follow-up (months) Merle d’Aubigne scoring
1 M/21 Traffic accident L Posterior wall 25 Excellent (17)
2 M/35 Traffic accident R Transverse, posterior wall Grade III Heterotopic ossification 58 Fair (12)
3 M/45 Traffic accident L T-shaped 28 Excellent (18)
4 F/27 Fall L Posterior wall Superficial infection 32 Excellent (17)
5 F/41 Traffic accident L Both column 42 Good (15)
6 M/68 Traffic accident R Transverse, posterior wall 66 Good (15)
7 F/41 Fall L Transverse 69 Excellent ( 18)
8 M/56 Traffic accident R Posterior column, posterior wall ANFH 41 Poor (7)
9 F/33 Fall R Both column 86 Good (15)
10 M/57 Fall R Posterior wall Posttraumatic arthritis 103 Good (15)
11 M/34 Traffic accident L Both column 61 Fair (13)
12 M/62 Traffic accident R Transverse, posterior wall 49 Excellent (18)
13 M/45 Fall L Both column 95 Excellent (17)
14 F/54 Traffic accident L Transverse, posterior wall ANFH 33 Poor (6)
15 F/28 Fall R Both column 42 Good (16)
16 M/57 Traffic accident R Transverse, posterior wall 84 Good (17)
17 M/36 Traffic accident L T-shaped 78 Good (16)
18 M/54 Traffic accident R Transverse 50 Excellent (18)
19 M/43 Fall R Transverse posterior wall Grade II heterotropic ossification 69 Good (16)

ANFH avascular necrosis of the femoral head