Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 14;34(8):1159–1165. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0887-x

Table 2.

Preoperative and follow-up clinical data by gender

Parameter Female knees (N = 174) Male knees (N = 86) Total (N = 260)
Preoperative
 KS pain (0–100) 33.0 ± 19.8 36.4 ± 20.1 34.1 ± 19.9
 KS knee (0–100) 42.3 ± 15.3 45.1 ± 16.7 43.2 ± 15.8
 KS function (0–100) 62.1 ± 18.2a 69.1 ± 15.7 64.4 ± 17.7
 KS total (0–100) 52.2 ± 14.2a 57.1 ± 13.2 53.8 ± 14.0
 ROM (°) 107.2 ± 17.0 106.2 ± 23.9 106.9 ± 19.5
Follow-up
 KS pain (0–100) 94.9 ± 12.3 95.2 ± 11.6 95.0 ± 12.1
 KS knee (0–100) 93.6 ± 9.9 93.7 ± 9.8 93.7 ± 9.8
 KS function (0–100) 85.7 ± 20.3a 91.5 ± 16.4 87.6 ± 19.2
 KS total (0–100) 89.7 ± 13.0 92.6 ± 10.9 90.6 ± 12.4
 ROM (°) 116.3 ± 14.2 116.5 ± 13.6 116.4 ± 14.0
Self-reported function
 Excellent 72 (41.4%)b 52 (60.5%) 124 (47.7%)
 Good 87 (50.0%)b 26 (30.2%) 113 (43.5%)
 Fair 13 (7.5%) 7 (8.1%) 20 (7.7%)
 Poor 2 (1.1%) 1 (1.2%) 3 (1.2%)

KS knee society, ROM range of motion

a Lower than males (P < 0.05; Mann-Whitney U test)

b Different than males (P < 0.01; z-ratio)

All KS scores and ROM at follow-up were higher than pre-surgery (P < 0.05; Wilcoxon test)