Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 25;67(7):436–443. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.044727

Table 3.

Application of search strategies to three pathologies: numbers of citations retrieved, proportions of potentially pertinent articles and overall NNR values

PubMed query Meningioma
(n=9460)
Pancreatitis
(n=24497)
Atrial fibrillation
(n=20313)
Overall
(n=54247)
Retrieved, n Pertinent, n (%) NNR Retrieved, n Pertinent, n (%) NNR Retrieved, n Pertinent, n (%) NNR Retrieved, n Pertinent, n (%) NNR
‘First string’ (more specific strategy) 20 16 (80) 1.2 19 10 (53) 1.9 20 11 (55) 1.8 59 37 (63) 1.6
‘First string’+narrow PubMed clinical query for aetiology9 5 4 (80) 1.2 5 1 (20) 5.0 2 1 (50) 2.0 12 6 (50) 2.0
‘First string’+broad PubMed clinical query for aetiology 9 17 14 (82) 1.2 14 6 (43) 2.3 6 2 (33) 3.0 37 22 (59) 1.7
‘Second string’ (more sensitive strategy) 80 18 (23) 4.4 195 22 (11) 8.9 232 22 (9) 10.5 507 62 (12) 8.2
‘Second string’ NOT ‘first string’ (incremental contribution of the second string) 60 2 (3) 30.0 176 12 (7) 14.7 212 11 (5) 19.3 448 25 (6) 17.9
String proposed by Schaafsma et al4 20 13 (65) 1.5 36 13 (36) 2.8 18 7 (39) 2.6 74 33 (45) 2.2
String used by the Cochrane Occupational Health Field3 51 17 (33) 3.0 108 18 (17) 6.0 60 15 (25) 4.0 220 50 (23) 4.4

(Occupational risk OR occupational diseases) AND name-of-the-disease.

(Occupat* OR worker*) AND name-of-the-disease.

NNR, number needed to read value.