Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 5;19(11):1841–1848. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1284-2

Table 2.

Multivariate models and predictors significantly associated with outcome

Predictor Back VAS improvement, R2 = 0.23 Leg VAS improvement, R2 = 0.39 OSWESTRY improvement, R2 = 0.49 PCSs improvement, R2 = 0.27
Back VAS 0–100 0.44 [0.23; 0.63] −0.21 [0.08; 0.35] −0.13 [−0.22; −0.05]
Leg VAS 0–100 0.67 [0.45; 0.89]
ODI 0.95 [0.78; 1.12]
PCSs −0.89 [−1.46; −0.30] −0.82 [−1.06; −0.59]
MCSs 0.20 [0.00; 0.40]
Diagnosis
 Other lumbar spinal disorders versus herniated disc 14.08 [4.50; 23.69] 10.06 [3.92; 16.21] 5.53 [1.78; 9.29]
Expectations
 Moderate/no expectations versus optimistic 12.48 [1.47; 24.03] 6.28 [0.12; 12.44]
Education
 Primary or lower versus secondary or higher 19.51 [9.19; 29.84] 7.55 [1.65; 13.46]
Smoking
 Non-smoker/ex-smoker versus smoker −10.09 [−20.10; −0.08]
Walking capacity
 Not limited versus somewhat limited 18.83 [8.31; 29.36]
 Not limited versus severely limited 23.82 [7.65; 40.00]

Values are given as β coefficient [95%CI]

VAS visual analog scale, BMI body mass index, ODI Oswestry disability index, PCSs physical component score, MCSs mental component score