Skip to main content
. 2010 May 1;19(9):1468–1478. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1383-0

Table 2.

Mode of failure and endplate tear morphology for motion segments that suffered disc failure

Segment (spine-disc) Growth plate status Failure pressure (MPa) Mode of failure Endplate tear
Torn endplate Radial locationa Circumferential Vertical location
Location Span (mm) lML C rML
3-L56 F 7.1 Diff
8-L56 F 11.4 Diff sup inner C → rML 2.9 E E
8-L12 U 10.5 MAb inf mid rML 1.5 E/V
7-L12 P 9.0 AE sup mid C → rML 4.1 E/V + E/V
3-L34 P 8.0 AEb inf mid C → rML 2.9 E/V E/V
5-L56 F 7.4 AE inf mid C → rML 2.5 E/V + A/E
5-L34 F 4.2 AE inf mid lML → rML 5.6 E/V E/V E/V
5-L12 P 5.6 AE inf mid lML → rML 5.9 E/V E/V + A/E

F fused, P partially fused, U unfused, Diff diffuse rupture, MA radial mid-axial tear, AE radial annular-endplate tear, sup superior, inf inferior, C central posterior, lML left mediolateral posterior, rML right mediolateral posterior, E within the cartilaginous endplate, E/V between the cartilaginous and vertebral endplates, A/E between the annulus and cartilaginous endplate, + = only fibres inclined in the direction of the applied torque were ruptured

aAs defined in Fig. 7

bTransligamentous nuclear extrusion