Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct-Dec;41(4):381–385. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.33876

Table 2.

Clinical details of patients

Age yrs/sex Nail diameter (mm) Radiological union (wks) Full weight bearing and return to school (wks) Hospital days Followup month Remarks
8M 3.0 8 8 8 20
10F 3.5 8 8 10 24
13M 3.5 8 8 8 28
19M 3.0 10 10 21 14 Head injury
6M 3.0 6 6 8 28 Limb lengthening-1.2 cm
12M 3.5 8 8 9 22
14M 3.5 10 12 14 26 # Both bone forearm
13M 3.5 8 8 8 30
7F 3.0 8 10 8 16 Limb lengthening-1.4 cm
11M 3.5 10 8 9 36
10M 3.0 8 10 12 30
13M 3.5 8 8 10 28 Varus angulation -12°
16F 4.0 12 12 12 30 Varus angulation-16°
15M 3.5 10 10 8 24 Valgus angulation-15°
6F 2.5 8 8 8 18 Limb lengthening-1.3 cm
10M 3.5 10 8 8 22
12M 3.5 10 10 10 26
7M 3.0 6 8 8 30
12M 3.5 10 10 12 34
16M 3.5 8 8 8 30
9F 3.0 8 8 8 28
11M 3.5 10 10 9 32