Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Insect Mol Biol. 2009 Dec 11;19(2):153–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00965.x

Table 2.

Significant GO Terms for all genes overlapping between this study and the Drosophila mating studies.

Category Term Count % P-Value
BP defense response 6 12 3.10E-03
BP response to biotic stimulus 4 8 1.60E-02
BP determination of muscle attachment site 2 4 3.20E-02
CC cytosolic ribosome (sensu Eukaryota) 4 8 4.70E-03
CC cytosolic part 4 8 1.10E-02
CC cytoplasm 13 26 1.40E-02
CC ribosomal subunit 4 8 2.70E-02
CC ribosome 4 8 4.00E-02
CC ribonucleoprotein complex 5 10 4.70E-02
MF antioxidant activity 3 6 9.90E-03
MF oxidoreductase activity 8 16 1.10E-02
MF voltage-gated potassium channel activity 3 6 1.80E-02
MF metal ion transmembrane transporter activity 4 8 2.60E-02
MF potassium channel activity 3 6 3.00E-02
MF voltage-gated cation channel activity 3 6 3.20E-02
MF voltage-gated channel activity 3 6 3.60E-02
MF voltage-gated ion channel activity 3 6 3.60E-02
MF glutathione peroxidase activity 2 4 3.60E-02

The results from this study showed a significant overlap with the results from three previous mating studies in Drosophila (Lawniczak 2004, McGraw 2004, McGraw 2008). The resulting genes that overlapped in one or more of these studies were input into DAVID for Gene Ontology analysis. The GO Terms associated with these genes are listed in the above table.