Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Conserv. 2010 Nov 1;143(11):2789–2796. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.028

Table D1.

Model selection table for A) sex effect on kitten survival and B) litter size effect on kitten survival. For each model, we present the number of parameters (K), the difference from the top model in Akaike’s Information Criterion adjusted for overdispersion and small sample size (ΔQAICc), the model QAICc weight, and the estimates of annual kitten survival with standard error (for both sexes and the highest and lowest litter sizes). The QAICc values of the top models are 857.23 and 845.66, respectively (compare to QAICc values for the base models run with the same datasets of 856.76 and 845.64, respectively). See Table 1 for descriptions of the covariate models and Table 2 (model 5) for the base2 model. The litter size analysis was performed on a subset of the data (excluding kittens from litters of unknown size). All models estimate constant recapture and recovery rates (p(.)r(.)).

A. Sex models Annual Kitten Survival Estimate (SE)
Survival Model K ΔQAICc Weight Female Male
1. base2 7 0.00 0.725 0.296 (0.054)
2. base2 + k:sex 8 1.94 0.275 0.311 (0.068) 0.282 (0.065)

B. Litter size models Annual Kitten Survival Estimate (SE)
Survival Model K ΔQAICc Weight 1 kitten 4 kittens

1. base2 7 0.00 0.735 0.280 (0.050)
2. base2 + k:LS 8 2.04 0.265 0.279 (0.109) 0.280 (0.081)