Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 28;398(7):2867–2881. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-4093-x

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Influence of different protocol variations. Comparison of average protein identifications after a protein extraction with urea lysis buffer or 0.1% TFA, b digestion with the in-solution or the in-gel approach, c digestion with trypsin or AspN, d MS/MS fragmentation and detection by IT-CID or IT-ETcaD, and e MS/MS database search using the MASCOT or SEQUEST search engines