Table 4.
Selected situations in where rebinding is likely to prolong drug/ligand-target binding
| Ligand | Target | System |
|---|---|---|
| (1)Thyrotropin | Thyrotropin receptors | Human thyroid membranes |
| (2)Naloxone | µ opioid receptor | Recombinant CHO cells |
| (3)Sartans | AT1 angiotensin II receptors | Recombinant CHO cells |
| (4)Spipeone | D2 dopamine receptors | Recombinant CHO cells |
| (5)Rimonabant, taranabant | CB1 cannabinoid receptors | Recombinant CHO cells |
| (6)Epidermal growth factor | EGF receptors | A431 cells |
| (7)Dinitrophenyl ligands | Cell-surface IgE | Rat basophilic leukemia cells |
| (8)Fibroblast growth factor-2 | Heparan sulphate proteoglycans | Vascular smooth muscle cells |
| (9)Diprenorphine, naloxone | Opioid receptors | Rat brain, in vivo |
| (10)CH 23390 | D1 dopamine receptors | Rat brain, in vivo |
| (11)Fasciculin 2 | Acetylcholinesterase | Neuromuscular junction |
| (12)Lectins | Selectin | Cell-cell interactions |
| (13)Peptide-MHC class II ligands | T cell receptors | Cell-cell interactions |
| (14)Antibodies (also monomeric) | Immobilized ampicillin | BIAcore biosensor |
Many other experimental observations in where target binding is shortened by the presence of an excess of other drugs/ligands have been published but they were, rightfully or not, merely commented in view of non-competitive interactions. References: (1) Powell-Jones et al., 1979; (2) Spivak et al., 2006; (3) Fierens et al., 1999; Le et al., 2007; (4) Packeu et al., 2008 (5) Szczuka et al., 2009; Wennerberg et al., 2010; (6) Wiley (1988); (7) Goldstein et al., 1989; Posner et al., 1992; (8) Chu et al., 2004; (9) Perry et al., 1980; (10) Gifford et al., 1998; (11) Krejci et al., 2006; (12) Lou et al., 2006; Thomas, 2006; (13) Germain, 1997; (14) Nieba et al., 1996.