Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 23.
Published in final edited form as: Microcirculation. 2009 Apr;16(3):203–212. doi: 10.1080/10739680802502423

Table 4.

Responses to an OGTT in chronic stroke subjects and controls with normal (NGT) and impaired (IGT) glucose tolerance

Stroke subjects (n = 12) IGT control (n = 12) NGT control (n = 12)
FPG (mmol/L) 5.7 ± 0.15*, 5.2 ± 0.09 5.3 ± 0.13
G120 (mmol/L) 10.2 ± 0.76 9.5 ± 0.28 5.6 ± 0.36
Glucose AUC (mmol/L/120min) 1,158 ± 60 1,073 ± 31 807 ± 47
Fasting Insulin (pmol/L) 180 ± 27§, 94 ± 9 82 ± 10
I120 (pmol/L) 1,125 ± 124 1,024 ± 183 383 ± 67
Insulin AUC (pmol/L/120min) 104,535 ± 10,573 107,947 ± 19,155 59,370 ± 7,212
ISIM 1.46 ± 0.21 2.26 ± 0.49 3.63 ± 0.40

Data are presented as mean±SEM.

*,§

Significant difference, compared to IGT controls (*P <0.05, §P <0.01);

†,‡,‖

significant difference, compared to NGT controls (P <0.05, P <0.01, P <0.001).

FPG, fasting plasma glucose; G120, 120-minute glucose; AUC, area under the curve; I120, 120-minute insulin; ISIM, insulin sensitivity index calculated by using the method of Matsuda and DeFronzo [22].