Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jan;15(1):69–82. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708090085

Table 2.

Neuropsychological performance by study group and cognitive domain

Total sample1 HCV−/SUD−2 HCV+/SUD−2 HCV+/SUD+2 Partial Eta2 p Value
Language Wilks’ Λ = .95, F(4, 230) = 1.635, p = .166 .028
    Letter Fluency 10.20 ± 3.31 10.70 ± 0.45 10.58 ± 0.69 9.33 ± 0.54 .034 .137
    Category Fluency 0.04 ± 1.03 0.20 ± 0.14 −0.19 ± 0.21 −0.06 ± 0.17 .024 .245
Verbal Memory Wilks’ Λ = .86, F(6, 228) = 2.95, p = .009 .083
    CVLT-II Total Immediate Recall 47.93 ± 10.78 51.96 ± 1.41ab 43.63 ± 2.15a 44.67 ± 1.69b .121 .001
    CVLT-II Long Delay Free Recall −0.12 ± 0.88 0.04 ± 0.12 −0.46 ± 0.18 −0.19 ± 0.14 .045 .067
    CVLT-II Recognition Correct Hits −0.46 ± 1.23 −0.31 ± 0.17 −0.77 ± 0.26 −0.68 ± 0.20 .026 .214
Visuospatial Memory Wilks’ Λ = .914, F(8, 194) =1.12, p = .351 .044
    BVMT-R Total Immediate Recall 39.39 ± 10.72 42.93 ± 1.43 36.61 ± 2.44 37.72 ± 1.83 .071 .025
    BVMT-R Delayed Recall 44.72 ± 13.04 47.79 ± 1.76 41.89 ± 3.02 43.28 ± 2.26 .039 .135
    RCF Immediate Recall −0.27 ± 0.82 −0.12 ± 0.12 −0.42 ± 0.20 −0.38 ± 0.15 .028 .242
    RCF Delayed Recall −0.31 ± 0.83 −0.18 ± 0.12 −0.42 ± 0.20 −0.45 ± 0.15 .025 .287
Auditory Attention Wilks’ Λ = .893, F(4, 230) = 3.33, p = .011 .055
    WAIS-III Digit Span 10.30 ± 2.73 11.96 ± 0.36a 9.04 ± 0.55a 10.08 ± 0.43 .091 .004
    WAIS-III Letter Number
        Sequencing
10.56 ± 2.75 11.37 ± 0.36a 9.71 ± 0.54a 10.28 ± 0.43 .064 .022
Speeded Visual Information
        Processing/Attention
Wilks’ Λ = .753, F(10, 208) = 3.17, p = .001 .132
    Trail A 45.64 ± 9.84 46.06 ± 1.40 44.85 ± 2.28 44.42 ±1.66 .008 .636
    Trail B 46.73 ± 9.09 48.47 ± 1.27 44.75 ± 2.06 45.82 ± 1.50 .028 .211
    WAIS-III Digit Symbol 8.97 ± 2.73 10.17 ± 0.35a 9.05 ± 0.58 7.68 ± 0.42a .161 .000
    D-KEFS CWIT Inhibition 9.64 ± 3.18 10.13 ± 0.44 8.75 ± 0.72 9.55 ± 0.52 .025 .249
    D-KEFS CWIT Switching 10.51 ± 2.69 11.0 ± 0.36 10.80 ± 0.59 10.00 ± 0.42 .030 .192
Motor Speed Wilks’ Λ = .944, F(8, 204) = .749, p = .648 .029
    Finger Tapping Dominant 39.59 ± 8.49 40.20 ± 1.21 39.10 ± 1.88 37.53 ± 1.44 .019 .368
    Finger Tapping Nondominant 43.29 ± 9.50 43.06 ± 1.33 44.14 ± 2.10 44.08 ± 1.58 .003 .849
    Pegboard Dominant 42.93 ± 9.74 45.38 ± 2.17 42.28 ± 1.39 45.81 ± 1.65 .014 .477
    Pegboard Nondominant 43.45 ± 9.17 44.72 ± 2.04 43.51 ± 1.31 44.14 ± 1.56 .003 .874
Visuomotor Construction
    RCF Copy −0.67 ± 1.28 −0.63 ± 0.17 −0.81 ± 0.26 −0.51 ± 0.21 .007 .661
Reasoning/Mental Flexibility Wilks’ Λ = .817, F(6, 228) = 4.03, p = .001 .096
    D-KEFS Sorting Correct Sorts 9.69 ± 2.69 10.73 ± 0.35ab 8.87 ± 0.53a 8.56 ± 0.41b .140 .000
    D-KEFS Proverbs Free Inquiry 9.34 ± 2.75 10.09 ± 0.37a 9.17 ± 0.56 8.23 ± 0.44a .084 .006
    WAIS-III Matrix Reasoning 11.43 ± 2.82 12.27 ± 0.37ab 10.50 ± 0.57a 10.64 ± 0.45b .088 .005

Note. Variables with the same superscript yielded significant univariate effects (p ≤ .05) using post hoc Scheffe tests. BVMT-R = Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, revised; CVLT-II = California Verbal Learning Test, second edition; CWIT = Color–Word Interference Test; D-KEFS = Delis-Kaplin Executive Functioning System; HCV = currently infected with chronic hepatits C virus; RCF = Rey Complex Figure; SUD = history of substance use disorder, currently in remission; WAIS-III = Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition.

1

Data expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.

2

Data expressed as estimated marginal means ± standard error.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure