Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Sci Eng. 2010 Sep 1;3:848–860. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2010.39115

Table 6.

The relations between multivariate brain areas investigated by fMRI sort by subjects. The number in the paragraph shows the ratio of FX·Y / FX,Y.

subject M1,SMA M1, cerebellum SMA, cerebellum subject M1,SMA M1, cerebellum SMA, cerebellum
1 S1 →(99.5%) 4 S1 ←(95.4%) →(95.4%)
S2 →(96.1%) →(92.4%) S2
S3 S3 ←(96.1%)
S4 S4 ←(67.9%) ←(24.5%)
S5 S5 →(91.6%)
S6 ←(96.7%) ←(97.7%) S6 ←(93.3%)
2 S1 5 S1 ←(96.6%) ←(99.7%)
S2 S2 ←(97.7%)
S3 S3
S4 S4 ←(96.3%) ←(95.4%)
S5 S5
S6 S6 →(95.8%)
3 S1 ←(96.9%) 6 S1
S2 ←(93.5%) ←(94.6%) S2 →(96.9%) →(97.5%)
S3 ←(94.1%) →(96.7%) →(96.7%) S3 →(97.2%)
S4 S4 ←(99.2%) ←(96.5%)
S5 S5 ←(92.3%) →(92.9%) →(92.2%)
S6 ←(95.7%) S6 →(96.9%)