Table 6.
subject | M1,SMA | M1, cerebellum | SMA, cerebellum | subject | M1,SMA | M1, cerebellum | SMA, cerebellum | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | S1 | – | →(99.5%) | – | 4 | S1 | ⇔ | ←(95.4%) | →(95.4%) |
S2 | →(96.1%) | →(92.4%) | – | S2 | – | – | – | ||
S3 | – | – | – | S3 | – | ←(96.1%) | – | ||
S4 | – | – | – | S4 | ←(67.9%) | ←(24.5%) | – | ||
S5 | – | – | – | S5 | →(91.6%) | ⇔ | – | ||
S6 | – | ←(96.7%) | ←(97.7%) | S6 | – | – | ←(93.3%) | ||
2 | S1 | – | – | – | 5 | S1 | ←(96.6%) | ←(99.7%) | – |
S2 | – | – | – | S2 | – | ←(97.7%) | – | ||
S3 | – | – | – | S3 | – | – | – | ||
S4 | – | – | – | S4 | – | ←(96.3%) | ←(95.4%) | ||
S5 | – | – | – | S5 | – | – | – | ||
S6 | – | – | – | S6 | →(95.8%) | – | – | ||
3 | S1 | – | ←(96.9%) | – | 6 | S1 | – | – | – |
S2 | – | ←(93.5%) | ←(94.6%) | S2 | →(96.9%) | →(97.5%) | – | ||
S3 | ←(94.1%) | →(96.7%) | →(96.7%) | S3 | – | →(97.2%) | – | ||
S4 | – | – | – | S4 | ←(99.2%) | – | ←(96.5%) | ||
S5 | – | – | – | S5 | ←(92.3%) | →(92.9%) | →(92.2%) | ||
S6 | – | ←(95.7%) | – | S6 | →(96.9%) | – | – |