Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;26(1):1–15. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0543

Table 2.

Lesion Depth and Behavioral/Electrophysiological Deficit Sensitivity

Functional test
 
 
 
BMS subscore
Footprint analysis
 
 
 
 
Lesion depth BMS BMS subscore Plantar stepping Coordination Paw position Trunk stability Tail position Stride length BOS RI Stance length Toe drag Beam walk Toe spread Hargreave's tcMMEP
0.5 mm 7.4 6.8 0.0 5.3 12.0 5.3 5.3 0.6 6.9 1.1 5.3 6.4 21.4 9.1 1.2 5.9
0.8 mm 8.9 8.1 0.0 11.9 10.5 9.3 5.2 3.8 3.7 1.7 1.7 6.5 23.0 3.0 2.6 0.1
1.1 mm 5.8 8.5 1.8 6.2 9.8 8.0 12.5 5.1 3.8 0.8 1.6 5.5 13.5 4.8 2.8 9.7
1.4 mm 28.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 23.6 10.0 38.4
1.6 mm 46.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 54.0 n/a n/a

Lesion depth and behavioral/electrophysiological deficit sensitivity: This table shows the deficit sensitivity measure (DSM). The formula is as follows: DSM = ((D*(S/T))/T))*100, where D is the magnitude of the deficit for each test, S represents the normal score for each test, and T represents the total scores of all the tests that each injury group was able to perform. For the 0.5-, 0.8-, and 1.1-mm groups, their total was based on 16 separate scores, while the 1.4-mm group's total was only based on 4, and the 1.6-mm group's total was only 2. Only one animal in the 1.4-mm group received a subscore at 42 dpi, thus no statistics were able to be run (n/a). Additionally, the 1.4- and 1.6-mm injured mice were not able to step consistently enough to perform the footprint test or the beam walk (n/a). The values in bold represent deficits that were significantly different from normal.