Table 4.

Comparison of our method to simple hill-climbing approach

Network	Real	Predicted	FDR(%)	FNR(%)
(i) Hill-climbing	1318	2108	86.67	78.68
(ii) Hill-climbing + weakly conn. nodes	1318	1517	43.57	35.05
(iii) Our approach (GA)	1318	1390	14.96	10.31

Comparison of our method to simple hill-climbing approach. (i) accuracy of the hill-climbing approach used over the complete network; (ii) accuracy of the hill-climbing approach after fixing the weakly connected nodes using our algorithm; (iii) accuracy of our combined pipeline using the genetic algorithm.