Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;29(6):610–617. doi: 10.1037/a0021237

Table 2.

Differences in goodness-of-fit indices for the Unconditional Means Model (UCMM), Unconditional Growth Model (UCGM), and Final Model predicting short-term risk perceptions, long-term risk perceptions, and benefits perceptions

Short-Term Risk Perceptions
Long-Term Risk Perceptions
Benefits Perceptions
UCMM UCGM Final UCMM UCGM Final UCMM UCGM Final
AIC 8037.15 7797.56 6592.00 9082.17 8831.42 7496.62 9311.30 8965.92 7617.50
Difference -- 239.59 a 1205.56 b -- 250.75 1334.8 -- 345.38 1348.42
BIC 8051.64 7826.41 6662.73 9097.02 8860.99 7568.21 9226.19 8995.56 7689.23
Difference -- 225.23 1163.68 -- 236.03 1292.78 -- 230.63 1306.33
Deviance 8031.15 7785.56 6563.00 9076.17 8819.42 7466.62 9205.30 8953.92 7587.50
Difference -- 245.59 1222.56 -- 256.75 1352.8 -- 251.38 1366.42

Note. AIC = Akaike Information Criterion, BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, Deviance = Deviance Statistic. All differences are significant. For the difference between the UCMM and the UCGM, χ2critical (3) = 9.35 at α = .05. For the difference between the UCGM and the Final Model, χ2critical (9) = 19.02 at α = .05.

a

UCMM - UCGM

b

UCGM - Final Model