Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2010 Aug 23;43(16):3227–3231. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.036

Table 3.

Gait measures (mean ±SD) for experimental and contralateral legs in Loaded and Sham groups with the varus loading device (VLD) engaged (compressive overload applied) and disengaged (no compressive overload applied). There were no significant differences between the Loaded and Sham groups and no significant differences between the VLD being engaged and disengaged for the Loaded or Sham groups.

Sham Group
Loaded Group
Contralateral Leg
Experimental Leg
Contralateral Leg
Experimental Leg
Gait Parameter
Engaged
Disengaged
Engaged
Disengaged
Engaged
Disengaged
Engaged
Disengaged
Contact Time (ms) 502±177 548±104 379±42 441±83 466±149 500±169 450±69 472±14
Braking Force (% BW)* −7.4±3.7 −5.8±2.3 −3.0±2.8 −4.4±2.8 −5.8±3.5 −8.7±3.1 −3.9±2.4 −4.6±1.8
Propulsive Force (% BW)* 9.9±4.9 10.4±1.4 5.4±2.5 4.7±2.3 11.0±1.6 9.5±2.4 10.5±12.2 6.8±2.3
Medial Force (% BW)* −6.8±2.7 −8.1±1.8 −2.1±1.9 −2.1±0.8 −6.6±0.9 −6.8±1.6 −3.1±2.0 −4.6±2.6
Lateral Force (% BW)* 2.1±1.3 1.9±1.0 8.2±2.8 7.9±2.5 1.4±0.4 2.0±1.3 5.2±2.8 5.3±.4.0
Vertical Force (% BW)* 64.5±6.2 64.8±3.8 49.0±12.3 45.7±11.1 68.6±5.7 61.7±12.2 47.5±13.0 53.9±11.0
*

Significant effect of Leg (Contralateral vs. Experimental) independent of Group or Engagement status (p<0.01).