Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Surg Res. 2010 Sep 15;164(2):e243–e251. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.032

S/A: Sham Ambulation; S/HLU: Sham Hindlimb Unloading; B/A: Burn Ambulation; B/HLU: Burn Hindlimb Unloading. Significant difference: #: S/A vs. B/A; ‡: S/A vs. S/HLU; †: S/HLU vs. B/HLU; *: B/A vs. B/HLU; (1): p<0.05; (2): p<0.01; (3): p<0.001. 1-A: body weight at day 14. B/HLU was significantly lower than S/HLU and B/A. S/HLU, and B/A was significantly lower than S/A. 1-B: Percentage change of body weight from the original body weight. B/HLU was significantly less than S/HLU and B/A. S/HLU, and B/A was significantly less than S/A. 1-C: Daily Average Food Consumption per Gram of Body Mass. B/HLU was significantly greater than S/HLU. B/A was significantly greater than S/A.

S/A: Sham Ambulation; S/HLU: Sham Hindlimb Unloading; B/A: Burn Ambulation; B/HLU: Burn Hindlimb Unloading. Significant difference: #: S/A vs. B/A; ‡: S/A vs. S/HLU; †: S/HLU vs. B/HLU; *: B/A vs. B/HLU; (1): p<0.05; (2): p<0.01; (3): p<0.001. 1-A: body weight at day 14. B/HLU was significantly lower than S/HLU and B/A. S/HLU, and B/A was significantly lower than S/A. 1-B: Percentage change of body weight from the original body weight. B/HLU was significantly less than S/HLU and B/A. S/HLU, and B/A was significantly less than S/A. 1-C: Daily Average Food Consumption per Gram of Body Mass. B/HLU was significantly greater than S/HLU. B/A was significantly greater than S/A.