Table 2.

Association between CT median income and risk of threshold suicidal ideation

	Unadjusted Model 11 OR; 95% CI z; p	Adjusted Model 22 OR; 95% CI z; p	Adjusted Model 33 OR; 95% CI z; p
SES
CT median household income
Higher	Reference	Reference	Reference
Lower	4.60 (1.64–12.86) 2.41; .004	5.01 (1.51–16.60) 2.64; .008	5.44 (1.71–17.24) 2.95; .003
Education
High School or less	Reference	Reference	Reference
Some College		0.84 (0.42–2.99) −.27; .788	0.71 (0.20–2.27) −.28; .779
College or Greater		0.82 (0.27–2.51) −.35l .726	1.38 (0.44–4.42) .25, .801
Demographics
Age (years)		.98 (0.92–1.05) −.52; .601	.98 (0.91–1.06) −.20, .838
Gender
Male		Reference	Reference
Female		2.30 (0.76–6.96) 1.47; .141	2.37 (0.76–7.45) 1.33, .182
Race/Ethnicity
Caucasian		Reference	Reference
Minority		.78 (.17–3.70) −.31; .759	.49 (.10–2.43) −.55, .584
Baseline Depression
HDRS < 10			Reference
HDRS ≥10			7.85 (2.70–23.02) 4.14, < .001

¹Unadjusted relative risk of threshold SI in older adults residing in low vs. middle or high CT median household income neighborhoods

²Model 2 included an individual-level socioeconomic indicator, education (high school or less, some college, college or greater) and demographic factors (age, gender, and race/ethnicity)

³Model 3 included baseline severity of depressive symptoms, implementing an indicator for sub-threshold levels of depression or above (HDRS >10), and indicators for high medical burden (CIRS >7, i.e., above the sample mean).

⁴P-values are obtained from z statistics and corresponding p-values are from Wald tests.