Table 1.
Interference paradigm. Representation of all odour combinations performed for the two conditioning cycles. (For graphical representation, we averaged the memory scores over all experimental or control combinations. OCT: 3-Octanol; MCH: 4-methylcyclohexanol; EA: ethyl-acetate; IAA: isoamyl acetate.)
| first training |
second training |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| odour paired with shock | odour not paired with shock | odour paired with shock | odour not paired with shock | test | |
| OCT | MCH | IAA | EA | OCT versus MCH | test of first training |
| OCT | MCH | EA | IAA | OCT versus MCH | |
| MCH | OCT | IAA | EA | OCT versus MCH | |
| MCH | OCT | EA | IAA | OCT versus MCH | |
| IAA | EA | OCT | MCH | IAA versus EA | |
| IAA | EA | MCH | OCT | IAA versus EA | |
| EA | IAA | OCT | MCH | IAA versus EA | |
| EA | IAA | MCH | OCT | IAA versus EA | |
| OCT | MCH | IAA | EA | IAA versus EA | test of second training |
| OCT | MCH | EA | IAA | IAA versus EA | |
| MCH | OCT | IAA | EA | IAA versus EA | |
| MCH | OCT | EA | IAA | IAA versus EA | |
| IAA | EA | OCT | MCH | OCT versus MCH | |
| IAA | EA | MCH | OCT | OCT versus MCH | |
| EA | IAA | OCT | MCH | OCT versus MCH | |
| EA | IAA | MCH | OCT | OCT versus MCH | |
| IAA | EA | IAA versus EA | control | ||
| EA | IAA | IAA versus EA | |||
| OCT | MCH | OCT versus MCH | |||
| MCH | OCT | OCT versus MCH | |||