Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jul 5;55(14):4153–4168. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/14/013

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Comparison of the CC view mammogram for case #3 (a) and the projection image obtained using our simulation model at 60% compression ratio (b). The distribution of the fibroglandular tissues on the simulated projection image resembles the distribution of dense tissues on the patient mammogram.