Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Oct 7;194(1):179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.09.019

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Damped-oscillator pseudo-wavelet analysis of computer generated data using X-DOOD. In these graphs, the computer generated data driving force h(t), data power S(f, t) and total energy measure E(f, t) are all rescaled so that the maximum value of each is equal to one. The friction is zero for all graphs except (f). See text for explanation. (a) Data driving force h(t) = xdata (t) and phase of 7 Hz mathematical oscillator, θ(7 Hz, t). (b) Data driving force h(t) = xdata (t), data power S(f, t) and total energy E(f, t) for the 7 Hz mathematical oscillator. (c) FFT power spectrum (in arbitrary units) of S(f, t) for the 7 Hz mathematical oscillator. (d) Data driving force h(t) = xdata (t), data power S(f, t) and total energy E(f, t) for the 60 Hz mathematical oscillator. (e) FFT power spectrum (in arbitrary units) of S(f, t) for the 60 Hz mathematical oscillator. (f) Data power S(f, t) and total energy E(f, t) for the 7 Hz mathematical oscillator, same as in (b), except here g(n)=1 Hz for all n. Note much slower decay back to baseline for E(f, t) compared to S(f, t).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure