. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Sep 21;23(12):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.08.014

Table 4.

Comparison of harmonic imaging and fundamental imaging measurements (n=51)

	Harmonic	Fundamental Imaging	Imaging ICC (ρ)
2D derived
LVM (g)	154 ± 39	152 ± 39	0.96

M-mode derived
Dd (cm)	4.9 ± 0.5	5.0 ± 0.6	0.94
VS (cm)	0.87 ± 0.13	0.85 ± 0.13	0.92
PW (cm)	0.87 ± 0.13	0.85 ± 0.12	0.89
LVM (g)	150 ± 42	150 ± 43	0.97
Relative WT	0.36 ± 0.06	0.35 ± 0.06	0.85

Values expressed as mean ± SD.

ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient; LVM, left ventricular mass; Dd, end-diastolic diameter; VS, ventricular septum; PW, posterior wall; WT, wall thickness.

All p values were not significant.