Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2010 Sep 16;207(2):234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.005

Table 1.

Results obtained for lung acinar airway structure depicted in Fig. 2 with α = 40° and parameters R and r distributed according to Gaussian distributions centered at R0 and r0 with STD of 17% of the mean values [3]. The numbers in parenthesis represent the relative difference (%) between the value found from the fitting analysis and the corresponding input value.

input parameters fitting parameters
R0, μm r0, μm (S/V)0, cm-1 R, μm r, μm S/V, cm-1
300 140 225 286 (-5%) 135 (-4%) 235 (4%)
300 180 190 296 (-1%) 163 (-9%) 210 (8%)
350 180 183 314 (-10%) 171 (-5%) 196 (7%)
350 220 156 330 (-6%) 199 (-9%) 172 (9%)