Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec;5(12):2220–2228. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04340510

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics of Fabry registry patients grouped by baseline eGFR values

eGFR
P
≥90 <90 to ≥60 <60
Men
    number of male patients, N 68 36 17
    eGFRa at baseline, mean SD) 109 (13.3) 78 (8.6) 42 (13.7)
    age at baseline eGFR, mean (SD), years 30 (9.4) 37 (12.5) 47 (16.1) <0.0001
    men with baseline UP/Cr data, n 29 12 7
        UP/Cr, baseline mean (SD) 0.9 (1.0) 1.5 (1.4) 1.8 (1.3) NS
        median (25th, 75th) 0.6 (0.2, 1.1) 1.3 (0.6, 1.8) 1.5 (0.8, 3.5)
    men with averaged UP/Cr data, n 68 36 17
        UP/Cr, averaged mean (SD) 0.8 (0.7) 1.3 (1.3) 1.9 (1.6) 0.0025
        median (25th, 75th) 0.6 (0.2, 1.2) 0.9 (0.1, 1.9) 1.5 (1.1, 2.2)
    BP, n 63 34 11
        averaged systolic BP (median, 25th, 75th), mmHg 128 (120, 137) 126 (114, 132) 122 (118, 134) NS
        averaged diastolic BP (median, 25th, 75th), mmHg 77 (72, 84) 77 (72, 82) 72 (70, 78) NS
    reported history of ACEi/ARB use, n (%) 12 (18) 9 (25) 5 (29) NS
Women
    number of female patients, N 210 114 17
    eGFRa at baseline, mean (SD) 109 (11.6) 76 (8.0) 47 (8.8)
    age at baseline eGFR, mean (SD), years 35 (11.3) 46 (10.7) 59 (11.7) <0.001
    women with baseline UP/Cr data, n 109 59 10
        UP/Cr, baseline mean (SD) 0.7 (0.9) 0.8 (1.1) 2.5 (2.1) 0.004
        median (25th, 75th) 0.2 (0.1, 0.9) 0.5 (0.1, 1.0) 2.1 (0.5, 4.2)
    women with averaged UP/Cr data, n 210 114 17
        UP/Cr, averaged mean (SD) 0.7 (0.9) 1.0 (1.4) 1.8 (1.9) 0.002
        median (25th, 75th) 0.2 (0.1, 0.9) 0.4 (0.1, 1.4) 1.0 (0.3, 2.9)
    BP, n 196 110 16
        averaged systolic BP (median, 25th, 75th), mmHg 119 (111, 129) 125 (113, 135) 138 (131, 144) <0.0001
        averaged diastolic BP (median, 25th, 75th), mmHg 74 (68, 80) 77 (70, 83) 84 (74, 90) 0.003
    reported history of ACEi/ARB use, n (%) 34 (16) 21 (18) 9 (53) 0.008

“Averaged” data reflect the average of all values reported within 6 months of the date of the first eGFR assessment to the most recent assessment. P values were calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test; NS, not significant.

a

eGFR data are expressed as ml/min per 1.73 m2.