Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 13;102(23):1780–1793. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq393

Table 4.

Prostate-specific Cox proportional hazard models, unadjusted and propensity score (PS) adjusted*

Variable label Unadjusted
PS adjusted (IPTW)
PS adjusted (SMRW)
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Conservative management vs radical prostatectomy 1.593 (1.267 to 2.003) <.001 1.599 (1.396 to 1.831) <.001 1.389 (1.098 to 1.757) .006
Age at diagnosis 70–74 vs 66–69 y 1.546 (1.265 to 1.89) <.001 1.578 (1.378 to 1.806) <.001 1.574 (1.232 to 2.01) <.001
Black non-Hispanic vs white non-Hispanic 1.023 (0.749 to 1.397) .887 1.225 (0.998 to 1.504) .052 1.336 (0.999 to 1.788) .051
Hispanic vs white non-Hispanic 1.057 (0.712 to 1.57) .783 0.993 (0.75 to 1.314) .960 1.237 (0.77 to 1.99) .379
Other race vs white non-Hispanic 0.505 (0.29 to 0.881) .016 0.435 (0.286 to 0.661) <.001 0.472 (0.247 to 0.902) .023
Married vs single 0.829 (0.662 to 1.038) .102 0.85 (0.729 to 0.991) .038 0.844 (0.663 to 1.074) .168
Stage T2 vs T1 1.265 (1.037 to 1.543) .021 1.38 (1.206 to 1.581) <.001 1.181 (0.932 to 1.498) .169
Grade moderately differentiated vs well differentiated 1.929 (1.116 to 3.335) .019 2.184 (1.463 to 3.262) .001 2.469 (1.327 to 4.593) .004
Grade poorly differentiated vs well differentiated 8.953 (5.167 to 15.516) <.001 10.376 (6.942 to 15.51) <.001 10.017 (5.317 to 18.873) <.001
Grade unknown vs well differentiated 4.441 (2.26 to 8.728) <.001 5.487 (3.385 to 8.895) <.001 5.984 (3.037 to 11.791) <.001
NCI comorbidity index of 0 vs unknown 0.417 (0.227 to 0.766) .005 0.342 (0.234 to 0.501) <.001 0.344 (0.186 to 0.634) <.001
NCI comorbidity index of 1 vs unknown 0.447 (0.225 to 0.89) .022 0.292 (0.186 to 0.457) <.001 0.285 (0.133 to 0.611) .001
NCI comorbidity index of ≥2 vs unknown 0.681 (0.347 to 1.335) .263 0.451 (0.292 to 0.696) <.001 0.47 (0.229 to 0.966) .040
Inflation-adjusted reimbursement in the year before diagnosis (2003 prices) 1 (1 to 1) .148 1 (1 to 1) <.001 1 (1 to 1) .210
Any inpatient, outpatient, or carrier claims in year before diagnosis vs no claims 1.572 (0.823 to 2.999) .170 1.995 (1.32 to 3.014) .001 1.956 (1.043 to 3.666) .036
Diagnosed in 1997 vs 1996 1.256 (0.938 to 1.682) .126 1.475 (1.202 to 1.81) <.001 1.492 (1.048 to 2.125) .026
Diagnosed in 1998 vs 1996 0.739 (0.512 to 1.068) .108 0.763 (0.59 to 0.987) .039 1.056 (0.698 to 1.599) .797
Diagnosed in 1999 vs 1996 0.777 (0.524 to 1.15) .207 0.918 (0.706 to 1.194) .523 0.709 (0.422 to 1.191) .194
Diagnosed in 2000 vs 1996 0.999 (0.666 to 1.498) .996 1.051 (0.798 to 1.383) .723 1.165 (0.717 to 1.894) .538
Diagnosed in 2001 vs 1996 0.645 (0.429 to 0.971) .036 0.661 (0.502 to 0.871) .003 0.742 (0.454 to 1.212) .234
Diagnosed in 2002 vs 1996 0.964 (0.643 to 1.445) .858 0.983 (0.745 to 1.298) .905 1.069 (0.648 to 1.763) .795
Diagnosed in 2003 vs 1996 0.586 (0.348 to 0.987) .045 0.67 (0.477 to 0.942) .021 0.712 (0.379 to 1.335) .289
*

CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; IPTW = Inverse probability of treatment weights; NCI = National Cancer Institute; SMRW = standardized mortality ratio weights.

A two-sided Wald χ2 test was used.