Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 13;102(23):1780–1793. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq393

Table 5.

All-cause Cox proportional hazard survival models, unadjusted and propensity score (PS) adjusted*

Variable label Unadjusted
PS adjusted (IPTW)
PS adjusted (SMRW)
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Conservative management vs radical prostatectomy 1.467 (1.351 to 1.594) <.001 1.537 (1.46 to 1.618) <.001 1.457 (1.332 to 1.593) <.001
Age at diagnosis 70–74 vs 66–69 y 1.627 (1.508 to 1.756) <.001 1.573 (1.494 to 1.657) <.001 1.573 (1.432 to 1.727) <.001
Black non-Hispanic vs white non-Hispanic 1.293 (1.163 to 1.438) <.001 1.365 (1.269 to 1.468) <.001 1.37 (1.227 to 1.53) <.001
Hispanic vs white non-Hispanic 0.946 (0.81 to 1.104) 0.479 0.924 (0.829 to 1.031) .158 0.978 (0.802 to 1.193) .828
Other race vs white non-Hispanic 0.667 (0.553 to 0.805) <.001 0.708 (0.623 to 0.805) <.001 0.615 (0.497 to 0.761) <.001
Married vs single 0.701 (0.646 to 0.761) <.001 0.743 (0.702 to 0.786) <.001 0.73 (0.667 to 0.8) <.001
Stage T2 vs T1 0.955 (0.884 to 1.032) .242 0.995 (0.944 to 1.05) .865 0.947 (0.865 to 1.037) .242
Grade moderately differentiated vs well differentiated 0.888 (0.786 to 1.003) .057 0.885 (0.813 to 0.963) .005 0.893 (0.778 to 1.024) .105
Grade poorly differentiated vs well differentiated 1.348 (1.172 to 1.55) <.001 1.46 (1.326 to 1.607) <.001 1.458 (1.234 to 1.722) <.001
Grade unknown vs well differentiated 0.94 (0.75 to 1.179) .594 0.911 (0.775 to 1.072) .261 0.921 (0.749 to 1.131) .431
NCI comorbidity index of 0 vs unknown 0.701 (0.507 to 0.968) .031 0.626 (0.505 to 0.776) <.001 0.661 (0.474 to 0.922) .015
NCI comorbidity index of 1 vs unknown 1.144 (0.817 to 1.601) .435 1.046 (0.836 to 1.309) .695 1.034 (0.725 to 1.473) .855
NCI comorbidity index of ≥2 vs unknown 1.897 (1.36 to 2.646) <.001 1.593 (1.275 to 1.989) <.001 1.695 (1.198 to 2.398) .003
Inflation-adjusted reimbursement in the year before diagnosis (2003 prices) 1 (1 to 1) <.001 1 (1 to 1) <.001 1 (1 to 1) <.001
Any inpatient, outpatient, or carrier claims in year before diagnosis vs no claims 1.118 (0.798 to 1.567) .515 1.295 (1.033 to 1.625) .025 1.213 (0.864 to 1.704) .265
Diagnosed in 1997 vs 1996 1.118 (0.993 to 1.259) .065 1.147 (1.055 to 1.246) .001 1.164 (1.009 to 1.342) .037
Diagnosed in 1998 vs 1996 0.921 (0.807 to 1.052) .226 0.87 (0.794 to 0.953) .003 0.921 (0.787 to 1.077) .302
Diagnosed in 1999 vs 1996 0.923 (0.799 to 1.066) .277 0.889 (0.806 to 0.982) .020 0.862 (0.722 to 1.03) .102
Diagnosed in 2000 vs 1996 0.971 (0.829 to 1.138) .719 0.902 (0.809 to 1.006) .063 0.932 (0.771 to 1.127) .468
Diagnosed in 2001 vs 1996 0.839 (0.727 to 0.967) .016 0.783 (0.711 to 0.863) <.001 0.824 (0.696 to 0.976) .025
Diagnosed in 2002 vs 1996 0.799 (0.683 to 0.936) .005 0.755 (0.679 to 0.839) <.001 0.769 (0.637 to 0.929) .007
Diagnosed in 2003 vs 1996 0.676 (0.562 to 0.814) <.001 0.633 (0.56 to 0.717) <.001 0.656 (0.524 to 0.82) <.001
*

CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; IPTW = inverse probability of treatment weights; NCI = National Cancer Institute; SMRW = standardized mortality ratio weights.

A two-sided Wald χ2 test was used.