Table 3.

Regression analyses of proportions associational, informal and individual activities on determinants

	Proportion associationala		Proportion informalb		Proportion individualc
	Model I	Model II	Model III	Model IV	Model V	Model VI
Year	.000	–	.004**	−	−.005**	−
Cohorts
Until 1930 (reference)		0		0		0
1931–1945		.011*		.015**		−.026**
1946–1960		−.003		.020**		−.016*
1961–1975		−.012~		.027**		−.015~
From 1976		.009		.046**		−.055*
Age		−.006**		−.002**		.008**
Age2 (/100)		.005**		.002**		−.007**
Church attendance		−.000		.001*		−.001
Women (ref = men)		−.021**		−.003		.023**
Employed (ref = other)		.003		−.002		−.001
Combining tasks		−.007*		−.003		.010*
Education		.006**		.006**		−.012**
Time problemsd		−.007**		.003		.004~
Valuesd
Relaxing & hobbies important		−.005		−.003		.008
Social contacts important		.006		−.006		.000
Self-development important		−.009*		.003		.006

^aModel I: N = 17,546, R² = .000; Model IIa: N = 17,399, R² = .056; Model IIb: N = 1,376, R² = .027; Model IIc: N = 7,050, R² = .063

^bModel III: N = 17,546, R² = .003; Model IVa: N = 17,399, R² = .025; Model IVb: N = 1,376, R² = .016; Model IVc: N = 7,050, R² = .021

^cModel V: N = 17,546, R² = .002; Model Va: N = 17,327, R² = .063; Model Vb: N = 1,369, R² = .035; Model Vc: N = 7,050, R² = .077

^dResults from separate analysis, data were only available in a few waves (effects controlled for gender, employment, combining tasks, education, age, age², church attendance)

~ p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01