Table 3. Distance of most probable transfer (r*) for wild type SLO and two mutants as a function of quantum number (n) of the acceptor wavefunction and type of model employed for the hydrogenic wells.

	Wild type SLO		Ile⁵⁵³ → Ala		Ile⁵⁵³ → Gly

	r*(H) (Å)	r*(D) (Å)	r*(H) (Å)	r*(D) (Å)	r*(H) (Å)	r*(D) (Å)
Harmonic oscillator
	r₀ = 0.75 Å		r₀ = 1.74 Å		r₀ = 2.87 Å
n = 0	0.70	0.68	0.84	0.71	1.00	0.81
n = 1	0.70	0.69	0.86	0.72	1.02	0.83
n = 2	0.71	0.69	0.87	0.74	1.04	0.84
n = 3	0.71	0.69	0.89	0.75	1.05	0.86
n = 4	0.71	0.69	0.90	0.77	1.06	0.87
n = 5	0.71	0.70	0.91	0.78	1.08	0.89
Morse oscillator
	r₀ = 1.02 Å		r₀ = 2.34 Å		r₀ = 3.35 Å
n = 0	0.93	0.89	1.13	0.89	1.39	1.03
n = 1	0.93	0.90	1.18	0.93	1.45	1.08
n = 2	0.94	0.91	1.23	0.97	1.51	1.13
n = 3	0.95	0.92	1.28	1.01	1.58	1.18
n = 4	0.96	0.92	1.33	1.06	1.66	1.24
n = 5	0.96	0.93	1.39	1.10	1.74	1.29

Also shown is the distance (r₀) between hydrogenic wells at the equilibrium position of the gating mode (r_X = 0) for both the harmonic oscillator and Morse oscillator models.