Table 4. Assessment of control options by simulations assuming 90% of enforcement was achieved.

Control options	Reduction rate (percentage)	Incidence avoided	Inputs	Feasibility	Negative impact	Assessment
Construct a boiling centre in Mbarara	47.4 (21.6–70.1)	477 (224–710)	A boiling centre, legislation, fuel	Middle-high	Price up	Recommendable
Construct boiling centres in peri-urban Kampala	82.0 (71.0–89.0)	825 (702–926)	Boiling centres, legislation, fuel	Middle	Price up, peri-urban soon becomes urban	Recommendable
Enforce milk shops to boil milk or to purchase boiled milk	56.6 (35.9–75.0)	568 (361–759)	Legislation, fuel, facility, enforce	Very low	Price up, corporation less likely to be given	Not recommendable
Ban of farm gate milk sales	0 (0.0–0.0)	0 (0–0)	Legislation, enforcement	Low	Alternative sellers may not boil	Not recommendable
Ban of urban dairy farming	−11.8 (−19.4–−5.4)	−118 (−196–−54)	Legislation, enforcement	Middle	Livelihood of urban farmers, milk supply shortage	Not recommendable
Ban of milk sales by vendors with a bicycle	0.0 (0.0–0.0)	0 (0–0)	Legislation, enforcement	High	Livelihood of vendors, alternative sellers may not boil	Not recommendable
Ban of roadside milk sales	0 (0.0–0.0)	0 (0–0)	Legislation, enforcement	High	Livelihood of vendors, alternative sellers may not boil	Not recommendable
Ban of milk sales at shops without refrigerators	−0.4 (−0.9–−0.1)	−4 (−10–−1)	Legislation, enforcement	High	Livelihood of vendors, alternative sellers may not boil	Not recommendable

Within () is 90% confidence interval.