Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 1;5(12):e15031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015031

Table 2. Comparison of ER status determined by microarray-based classifiers to the ER status based on conventional IHC method in 1846 samples from 10 published data sets.

Expression-based ER status ESR1 based ER+ ESR1 based ER- P value 23-gene signature based ER+ 23-gene signature based ER- P value
IHC ER+ 93.0% 7.0% <2.20E-16 90.9% 9.1% <2.20E-16
IHC ER- 15.1% 84.9% <2.20E-16 21.8% 78.2% <2.20E-16
Overall concordance 90.7% 87.3%
Basal 7.2% 92.8% <2.20E-16 3.9% 96.1% <2.20E-16
Luminal A 99.8% 0.2% <2.20E-16 98.6% 1.4% <2.20E-16
Luminal B 99.4% 0.6% <2.20E-16 96.3% 3.7% <2.20E-16
Her2 36.3% 63.7% <2.20E-16 48.7% 51.3% <2.20E-16