Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatrics. 2010 Sep 27;126(4):e788–e795. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1187

TABLE 4.

Risk of RDa Associated with ADHD, Separately by Gender

N Number of RD cases by age 19 Cumulative incidence by age 19, % (95%CI) Unadjusted HRb (95% CI), P-value Adjusted HRc (95% CI), P-value
Boys
 ADHD 284 137 51.0 (44.5–56.6) 4.27 (3.50–5.21), <0.001 3.94 (3.19–4.85), <0.001
 Non-ADHD 2666 332 14.5 (13.0–15.9) 1.00 1.00
Girls
 ADHD 95 43 46.7 (35.5–56.0) 7.73 (5.54–10.80),<0.001 8.13 (5.73–11.54),<0.001
 Non-ADHD 2654 176 7.7 (6.6–8.8) 1.00 1.00

HR, hazard ratio for ADHD vs. Non-ADHD.

a

RD, reading disability as determined by any of the three formulas.

b,c

There is a statistically significant difference between the HR (for ADHD vs. non-ADHD) among boys and that among girls (P = 0.003 in the unadjusted model and P = 0.001 in the adjusted model).

c

Adjusted for children’s race (white v. non-white), mother’s educational level (four categories) and mother’s age at birth of child.