Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 11;3:29. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-3-29

Table 6.

Likelihood of having depression according to vitamin D status in study population: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey¹

Characteristic Major depression
OR (95% CI)
(n = 7877)
Depression >2 y
OR (95% CI)
(n = 7970)
Current depression
OR (95% CI)
(n = 1221)
Unadjusted analysis for serum vitamin D
 Deficient (<50 nmol/L) 0.95 (0.65 - 1.37) 1.43 (1.09 - 1.86) 2.01 (1.25 - 3.24)
 Insufficient (50-75 nmol/L) 0.92 (0.66 - 1.26) 1.07 (0.78 - 1.46) 0.75 (0.44 - 1.27)
 Sufficient (>75 nmol/L) 2 1.0 1.0 1.0
 P-Value 3 0.86 0.022 <0.001
Multivariate adjusted analysis for serum vitamin D 4
 Deficient (<50 nmol/L) 1.17 (0.71 - 1.90) 0.84 (0.57 - 1.23) 1.85 (0.90 - 3.81)
 Insufficient (50-75 nmol/L) 0.93 (0.62 - 1.40) 0.77 (0.53 - 1.13) 0.70 (0.38 - 1.29)
 Sufficient (>75 nmol/L) 2 1.0 1.0 1.0
 P-Value 3 0.60 0.39 0.021

1Depression was assessed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule developed by the National Institute of Mental Health. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from the logistic regression analysis

2 Referent category

3 Significance for the Wald F in the multivariate logistic regression

4 Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for sex, race-ethnicity, age, geographical location, urbanization, vitamin/mineral supplement use, prescription medicine use, poverty income ratio, body mass index, and serum creatinine