Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Open Access J Clin Trials. 2010 Sep 1;2010(2):149–156. doi: 10.2147/OAJCT.S11915

Table 1.

Observed differences among MSM and TGs (N = 176)

Before After Beforea Aftera Mean difference


N N Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Outcomes
 Future attendance at HIV vaccine activities 77 85 8.57 (2.00) 8.00 (2.52) −0.57
 Community mobilization 78 83 5.60 (2.94) 5.55 (3.05) −0.05
 Study screen 77 80 4.29 (3.32) 5.36 (3.40) 1.07*
 Study enrollment 71 79 3.94 (3.12) 5.09 (3.43) 1.15*
 HIV vaccine research promotion in community 76 85 6.46 (3.19) 6.34 (3.02) −0.12
Community engagement factors
 Attitudes 79 88 8.47 (2.52) 8.43 (3.31) −0.04
 Behavioral beliefs 77 86 12.97 (4.10) 12.43 (4.82) −0.54
 Outcome evaluation (risk perception) 80 91 17.49 (4.29) 16.49 (4.79) 1.00
 Organizational involvement (study-site assessment) 79 88 10.33 (2.66) 9.65 (2.61) −0.68
 Social activism congruence 80 85 16.06 (4.01) 16.18 (4.83) 0.12
*

P < 0.05.

a

“Before” data collected prior to 21 September 2007. “After” data collected subsequent to 22 September 2007.

Abbreviations: MSM, men-who-have-sex-with-men; TGs, transgenders; SD, standard deviation; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.