Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Dec 24;40(2):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.11.001

Table 2.

Mixed Linear Logistic Regression Models Estimating the Effective of Motivational Interviewing on the Likelihood of Marijuana Use at Follow-Up (n = 332 subjects observed on 83,052 person days).

Model 1 Model 2
Fixed Effects OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
Treatment (MI = 1) 1.28 (0.76 – 2.17) 1.15 (0.49 – 2.70)
Any Desire To Quit (Yes = 1) 0.32** (0.15 – 0.68)
Time
  Month 1 0.62** (0.49 – 0.79) 0.43** (0.30 – 0.62)
  Month 3 0.75 (0.57 – 1.00) 0.44** (0.26 – 0.74)
  Month 6 0.63** (0.46 – 0.85) 0.41** (0.24 – 0.72)
Treatment by Time
  Month 1 0.77 (0.53 – 1.12) 1.41 (0.77 – 2.58)
  Month 3 0.53** (0.33 – 0.86) 1.17 (0.54 – 2.52)
  Month 6 0.74 (0.47 – 1.17) 1.44 (0.65 – 3.22)
Treatment by Quit Desire 0.96 (0.33 – 2.73)
Quit Desire by Time
  Month 1 1.64* (1.02 – 2.63)
  Month 3 2.19* (1.18 – 4.07)
  Month 6 1.78 (0.94 – 3.37)
Treatment by Quit Desire by
Time
  Month 1 0.42* (0.20 – 0.90)
  Month 3 0.31* (0.12 – 0.83)
  Month 6 0.35* (0.13 – 0.91)
Random Effects
Subject (Variance) 4.99** 4.56**
Log L - -
36908.8 36257.6

p < .05,

**

p < .01

Model 2 includes n=328; 4 persons missing Quit Desire response