Table 1.

Genome rearrangement analysis and by progressive MAUVE and GRIMM of bacterial species.

Bacteria	No. of LCBa	Reversal distanceb
A. actinomycetemcomitans HK1651 vs D7S-1	102	80
A. actinomycetemcomitans HK1651 vs D11S-1	9	5
H. somnus 2336 vs 129PT	51	37
H. influenzae Rd KW20 vs 86-028NP	11	6
H. influenzae PittEE vs PittGG	23	17
E. coli 536 vs ATCC8739	9	5
E. coli O157:H7 EDL933 vs O12:H6 E2348/69	9	7
E. coli O157:H7 EDL933 vs ATCC8739	6	3
E. coli CFT073 vs E. coli O157:H7 EDL933	21	16
N. gonorrhoeae NCCP11945 vs FA1090	14	10
N. meningitides FAM18 vs MC58	16	10
N. meningitides Z2491 vs MC58	14	8
P. gingivalis ATCC33277 vs W83	41	29
P. aeruginosa PA7 vs PAO1	12	7
P. aeruginosa LESB58 vs PAO1	8	5
A. actinomycetemcomitans HK1651 vs A. aphrophilus NJ8700	155	127
A. actinomycetemcomitans D7S-1 vs A. aphrophilus NJ8700	192	162

^aLCB; locally colinear block identify by the progressive MAUVE

^bReversal distance is determined from the post-analysis of genome rearrangement by the progressive MAUVE using the GRIMM algorithms.