Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 3;5(12):e14218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014218

Table 1. Analyses of disease resistance of transgenic cotton lines.

plant number Infectionrate(%) DiseaseIndex(DI) Disease resistant(R)/Tolerance(T)/Susceptible(S)
Transplant T1/F1 T2/F2 T3/F3 T1/F1 T2/F2 T3/F3 T1/F1 T2/F2 T3/F3
KB1 16.7*±2.3 54.2*±0.96 38.1*±1.49 14.6*±1.05 17.9*±0.87 13.5*±0.45 R R R
KB2 24.1*±0.75 47.3*±1.04 44.1*±0.82 16.9*±0.45 15.1*±0.89 18.8*±0.56 R R R
KB3 10.7*±1.32 53.6*±0.62 39*±0.66 8.8*±0.66 17.1*±0.46 15.9*±0.56 HR R R
Control Z99668 35.8±0.85 49.6±0.7 56.4±0.95 33.8±0.66 20.6±0.7 25.5±0.95 T T T

Disease evaluation standards: HR, highly resistant plants with a DI value between 0 and 10.0; R, resistant plants with a DI value between 10.1 and 20.0; T, disease tolerance plants with a DI value between 20.1 and 35.0; S, susceptible plants with a DI value >35.0. The means standard deviations (SD) were calculated based on three replications. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (P<0.05) between the control plant(z99668) and each transgenic lines (KB1, KB2 and KB3).