Table 1. Analyses of disease resistance of transgenic cotton lines.
plant number | Infectionrate(%) | DiseaseIndex(DI) | Disease resistant(R)/Tolerance(T)/Susceptible(S) | |||||||
Transplant | T1/F1 | T2/F2 | T3/F3 | T1/F1 | T2/F2 | T3/F3 | T1/F1 | T2/F2 | T3/F3 | |
KB1 | 16.7*±2.3 | 54.2*±0.96 | 38.1*±1.49 | 14.6*±1.05 | 17.9*±0.87 | 13.5*±0.45 | R | R | R | |
KB2 | 24.1*±0.75 | 47.3*±1.04 | 44.1*±0.82 | 16.9*±0.45 | 15.1*±0.89 | 18.8*±0.56 | R | R | R | |
KB3 | 10.7*±1.32 | 53.6*±0.62 | 39*±0.66 | 8.8*±0.66 | 17.1*±0.46 | 15.9*±0.56 | HR | R | R | |
Control | Z99668 | 35.8±0.85 | 49.6±0.7 | 56.4±0.95 | 33.8±0.66 | 20.6±0.7 | 25.5±0.95 | T | T | T |
Disease evaluation standards: HR, highly resistant plants with a DI value between 0 and 10.0; R, resistant plants with a DI value between 10.1 and 20.0; T, disease tolerance plants with a DI value between 20.1 and 35.0; S, susceptible plants with a DI value >35.0. The means standard deviations (SD) were calculated based on three replications. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (P<0.05) between the control plant(z99668) and each transgenic lines (KB1, KB2 and KB3).