Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Sep 9;54(2):985–991. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.004

Table 2. Simulation Results.

Estimated power to detect an association using a Cox-model based approach vs. a two-sample t-test comparing progressors and non-progressors. We assume rank-transformed GMD values, a sample size of n=123, and a two-sided alpha level of 0.05.

Effect Size Expressed in terms of Hazard Ratioa
Analysis Performed 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Cox model approach 0.39 0.80 0.97 1.0
Two-sample approach
 1 y follow-up cutoff 0.15 0.30 0.53 0.62
 2 y follow-up cutoff 0.24 0.54 0.80 0.88
 3 y follow-up cutoff 0.29 0.63 0.88 0.94
 4 y follow-up cutoff 0.27 0.58 0.84 0.91
 5 y follow-up cutoff 0.18 0.39 0.62 0.70
a

Hazard ratio based on comparing the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile